TOP 200 effective Steemit сurators that encourage discussion for the last week (2018.07.16-2018.07.22)

@boddhisattva · 2018-07-29 16:58 · busy

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators of the last week.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

top200.jpg

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

But this time we will review those curators who reward the discussions, that is, they vote for the comments of other users.

According to the ideology of the Steemit creators, the discussion is as valuable an element as the author's content. Confirmation of this is the allocation of a separate pool of awards for comments.

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published rewarded comments for the period under study is determined. Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

14916 authors published their rewarded comments during this week.

17380 accounts participated in the comments curating according to information from the database.

254176 votes were made during this week.

31072,86 SBD - is the total author rewards for this week.

TOP-200 effective comments curators for the last week (2018.07.16-2018.07.22)

№ Account Votes Authors VAS(%) Contr. (SBD) Share % Eff.
1 @steemhunt 2737 80 1 1933,3 6,22 10,37
2 @utopian-io 57 47 23 3158,96 10,17 9,95
3 @gentlebot 648 502 15 283,41 0,91 9,54
4 @ngc 748 169 4 488,59 1,57 5,54
5 @surpassinggoogle 569 299 1 231,25 0,74 4,64
6 @engagement 748 169 4 274,15 0,88 3,11
7 @dustsweeper 2996 501 2 78,76 0,25 2,65
8 @musing 606 155 9 197,4 0,64 2,05
9 @cron 171 91 46 308,8 0,99 1,88
10 @sniffnscurry 444 91 3 281,11 0,9 1,72
11 @trafalgar 298 23 6 888,76 2,86 1,37
12 @fundition 21 13 98 1456,71 4,69 1,27
13 @bcc 692 41 11 346,53 1,12 0,95
14 @thecyclist 748 169 4 78,84 0,25 0,89
15 @uche-nna 189 83 52 156,81 0,5 0,87
16 @btu 594 39 12 328,16 1,06 0,86
17 @czechglobalhosts 266 109 3 117,04 0,38 0,86
18 @blocktrades 21 7 63 1608,51 5,18 0,75
19 @thetruth36 318 96 31 102,07 0,33 0,66
20 @thedelegator 748 169 4 41,26 0,13 0,47
21 @randomthoughts 748 169 4 36,61 0,12 0,41
22 @jaki01 204 120 5 49,21 0,16 0,4
23 @d-pend 176 52 12 110,24 0,35 0,38
24 @surfyogi 154 116 10 48,62 0,16 0,38
25 @acidyo 78 64 4 80,09 0,26 0,34
26 @hebrew 130 127 10 33,1 0,11 0,28
27 @ulfr 270 78 17 49,86 0,16 0,26
28 @r2cornell 153 135 13 28,86 0,09 0,26
29 @agawolf 114 33 48 115,13 0,37 0,25
30 @nathanmars 305 99 4 37,54 0,12 0,25
31 @berniesanders 751 170 4 21,37 0,07 0,24
32 @tarazkp 349 121 6 29,77 0,1 0,24
33 @adm 1149 4 2 905,24 2,91 0,24
34 @shaka 100 60 10 57,09 0,18 0,23
35 @double-u 233 52 23 63,42 0,2 0,22
36 @comedyopenmic 192 30 18 105,88 0,34 0,21
37 @iflagtrash 748 169 4 17,82 0,06 0,2
38 @brian.rrr 171 59 11 50,17 0,16 0,2
39 @exyle 241 107 1 25,69 0,08 0,18
40 @dimimp 55 32 99 74,34 0,24 0,16
41 @goldmatters 239 69 4 35,08 0,11 0,16
42 @roelandp 29 28 88 79,86 0,26 0,15
43 @steemjetcontests 91 18 99 117,98 0,38 0,14
44 @ackza 176 109 29 19,33 0,06 0,14
45 @whatsup 233 133 14 16,15 0,05 0,14
46 @bbana 118 62 18 32,88 0,11 0,14
47 @steevc 309 143 8 12,05 0,04 0,12
48 @rok-sivante 52 30 36 58,73 0,19 0,12
49 @alexbeyman 205 61 10 28,22 0,09 0,12
50 @donkeypong 52 49 2 32,8 0,11 0,11
51 @mbj 150 53 63 27,26 0,09 0,1
52 @tasteem 40 9 4 163,88 0,53 0,1
53 @sharonomics 51 46 100 34 0,11 0,1
54 @rynow 478 161 2 9,2 0,03 0,1
55 @stephenkendal 155 74 5 20,31 0,07 0,1
56 @teamsteem 56 52 4 25,55 0,08 0,09
57 @ctrl-alt-nwo 126 87 2 14,69 0,05 0,09
58 @jrcornel 45 7 85 192,88 0,62 0,09
59 @ocd 113 48 4 27,76 0,09 0,09
60 @pairplay 84 18 21 65,21 0,21 0,08
61 @mattclarke 102 66 25 17,54 0,06 0,08
62 @sjchoi 51 28 93 35,05 0,11 0,07
63 @mythologyupvote 155 24 52 43,35 0,14 0,07
64 @ranchorelaxo 16 1 100 1040,56 3,35 0,07
65 @selfvotejustice 87 11 84 95,78 0,31 0,07
66 @nonameslefttouse 135 70 8 15,45 0,05 0,07
67 @jeezzle 98 31 50 35,91 0,12 0,07
68 @timcliff 103 81 6 13,38 0,04 0,07
69 @adrianobalan 103 20 56 50,96 0,16 0,07
70 @thedamus 196 66 25 15,01 0,05 0,07
71 @nextgencrypto 748 169 4 6,59 0,02 0,07
72 @onceuponatime 67 49 2 20,68 0,07 0,07
73 @sndbox 54 47 2 23,62 0,08 0,07
74 @boxmining 96 48 96 21,96 0,07 0,07
75 @abh12345 220 134 4 7,48 0,02 0,07
76 @edgarsart 244 42 75 25,93 0,08 0,07
77 @saramiller 64 23 31 39,15 0,13 0,06
78 @streetstyle 87 36 15 26,62 0,09 0,06
79 @laodr 197 64 24 12,87 0,04 0,06
80 @ericvancewalton 88 45 80 18,58 0,06 0,06
81 @abusereports 378 7 6 136,64 0,44 0,06
82 @senseicat 50 26 25 33,42 0,11 0,06
83 @gooddream 67 39 30 21,45 0,07 0,06
84 @ernestfung 235 40 100 21,56 0,07 0,06
85 @steemjet 45 26 59 35,89 0,12 0,06
86 @krnel 172 90 3 9,75 0,03 0,06
87 @djohan 230 28 73 32,9 0,11 0,06
88 @l-s-h 81 46 28 20,59 0,07 0,06
89 @meesterboom 210 77 2 10,35 0,03 0,05
90 @davidorcamuriel 39 8 91 90,18 0,29 0,05
91 @adsactly 50 25 1 29,67 0,1 0,05
92 @julisavio 75 12 84 60,31 0,19 0,05
93 @hiroyamagishi 62 16 74 42,59 0,14 0,05
94 @xpilar 156 44 5 16,25 0,05 0,05
95 @urso 61 4 100 171,07 0,55 0,05
96 @oracle-d 116 48 4 16 0,05 0,05
97 @bullionstackers 52 34 35 21,04 0,07 0,05
98 @steamsteem 151 20 38 37,23 0,12 0,05
99 @armdown 121 64 13 10,96 0,04 0,05
100 @mehta 104 35 57 22,41 0,07 0,05
101 @full-measure 77 16 74 42,66 0,14 0,05
102 @phoneinf 198 68 15 11,77 0,04 0,05
103 @aguia 62 4 100 175,83 0,57 0,05
104 @gutzygwin 98 19 89 29,56 0,1 0,04
105 @mysearchisover 267 38 65 16,36 0,05 0,04
106 @fuzzyvest 15 12 16 51,66 0,17 0,04
107 @socky 37 17 34 35,02 0,11 0,04
108 @matt-a 37 22 9 29,25 0,09 0,04
109 @dhimmel 45 19 76 31,06 0,1 0,04
110 @mantishands 100 31 33 17,3 0,06 0,04
111 @schmidthappens 54 34 20 16,14 0,05 0,04
112 @vegawesome 296 16 92 38,81 0,12 0,04
113 @lyndsaybowes 209 86 8 6,22 0,02 0,04
114 @lokiyngling 293 16 95 38,97 0,13 0,04
115 @armentor 55 20 44 27,43 0,09 0,04
116 @rahemanali 50 45 100 13,24 0,04 0,04
117 @lotto-austria 280 85 13 7,76 0,02 0,04
118 @uwelang 63 44 16 14,57 0,05 0,04
119 @shortcut 156 108 10 5,85 0,02 0,04
120 @jamesbrown 53 4 95 137,5 0,44 0,04
121 @brotherhood 43 8 72 72,97 0,23 0,04
122 @cryptopie 202 63 10 9,74 0,03 0,04
123 @bitcoinflood 66 13 81 50,23 0,16 0,04
124 @francisk 184 67 11 9,51 0,03 0,04
125 @thing-2 272 199 100 3,28 0,01 0,04
126 @dragosroua 161 62 6 10,39 0,03 0,04
127 @kenny-crane 83 39 29 15,4 0,05 0,04
128 @kevinwong 40 24 4 23,12 0,07 0,04
129 @majes.tytyty 134 40 8 15,09 0,05 0,04
130 @himapan 315 84 8 6,78 0,02 0,04
131 @neoxian 117 52 4 12,34 0,04 0,04
132 @elizahfhaye 109 28 74 19,13 0,06 0,04
133 @nextgen622 51 6 98 87,25 0,28 0,04
134 @cicbar 126 56 9 10,09 0,03 0,04
135 @sponge-bob 156 46 22 8,8 0,03 0,03
136 @steemrant 33 11 98 36,15 0,12 0,03
137 @levfevzi 65 10 41 38,86 0,13 0,03
138 @steemflagrewards 197 29 29 13,21 0,04 0,03
139 @master-set 64 15 75 27,85 0,09 0,03
140 @extrospect 47 1 100 378,27 1,22 0,03
141 @coruscate 156 83 7 5,75 0,02 0,03
142 @empato365 64 19 90 19,7 0,06 0,03
143 @steemjet-support 87 3 100 124,92 0,4 0,03
144 @bytzz 49 26 70 18,96 0,06 0,03
145 @megaspore 40 23 32 21,55 0,07 0,03
146 @talanhorne 57 38 50 10,98 0,04 0,03
147 @gamer00 95 42 6 9,97 0,03 0,03
148 @littleboy 69 29 64 13,66 0,04 0,03
149 @rivalhw 50 34 6 13,1 0,04 0,03
150 @noaommerrr 95 2 100 200,02 0,64 0,03
151 @overkillcoin 105 47 25 10,09 0,03 0,03
152 @quinneaker 37 10 47 47,54 0,15 0,03
153 @roxane 92 65 2 6,91 0,02 0,03
154 @cjsdns 112 51 2 7,71 0,02 0,03
155 @partiko 59 53 37 7,16 0,02 0,03
156 @cryptogee 64 39 100 11,69 0,04 0,03
157 @trumpman 105 48 12 10,29 0,03 0,03
158 @granturismo 95 75 11 6,28 0,02 0,03
159 @havok777 64 20 50 11,63 0,04 0,02
160 @xemurai 102 56 16 5,27 0,02 0,02
161 @hatu 106 66 85 3,96 0,01 0,02
162 @dlive 8 2 15 157,62 0,51 0,02
163 @teardrops 56 36 51 7,41 0,02 0,02
164 @sijun 69 5 100 49,23 0,16 0,02
165 @jaybird 133 92 4 3,53 0,01 0,02
166 @trevonjb 59 38 1 6,05 0,02 0,02
167 @lordjames 40 31 69 8,14 0,03 0,02
168 @mustard 10 9 45 25,3 0,08 0,02
169 @solominer 79 16 54 19,44 0,06 0,02
170 @antonireviews 209 63 50 3,72 0,01 0,02
171 @benadam 50 44 100 7,32 0,02 0,02
172 @modernpastor 57 35 6 8,96 0,03 0,02
173 @bitcoingodperson 60 34 20 8,98 0,03 0,02
174 @darsico 80 17 43 16,97 0,05 0,02
175 @mys 630 174 2 1,83 0,01 0,02
176 @oddbot 101 15 100 18,47 0,06 0,02
177 @marksheppard 102 41 4 8,15 0,03 0,02
178 @kiefpreston.com 84 17 69 18,8 0,06 0,02
179 @sift666 103 40 13 6 0,02 0,02
180 @falconcash 55 1 100 261,15 0,84 0,02
181 @spinbunny 48 2 83 175,49 0,56 0,02
182 @bleujay 23 13 50 25,74 0,08 0,02
183 @canadian-coconut 37 22 1 16,48 0,05 0,02
184 @o07 113 59 87 4,82 0,02 0,02
185 @valorforfreedom 94 49 53 5,61 0,02 0,02
186 @slobberchops 152 56 11 5,8 0,02 0,02
187 @vjbasil 106 30 43 9,34 0,03 0,02
188 @prosperist 50 45 100 7,65 0,02 0,02
189 @kibumh 251 82 9 3,74 0,01 0,02
190 @bowsteem 47 21 97 13,1 0,04 0,02
191 @discernente 69 15 67 22,08 0,07 0,02
192 @ipromote 362 3 2 117,86 0,38 0,02
193 @maygor 81 48 100 6,01 0,02 0,02
194 @razipelangi 102 37 83 8,82 0,03 0,02
195 @abigail-dantes 73 47 3 7,42 0,02 0,02
196 @vikisecrets 101 43 10 6,71 0,02 0,02
197 @everittdmickey 240 61 2 4,56 0,01 0,02
198 @sisters 43 31 40 7,62 0,02 0,02
199 @deanliu 29 18 21 14,5 0,05 0,02
200 @steemchiller 49 42 83 8,27 0,03 0,02

I took all vote bots (most of them are working like pay for vote) in the separate table. Because we can't call them effective curators. Their work depends on authors payments and activity. If you know another bots in the list above please tell me about it.

№ Account Votes Authors VAS(%) Contr. (SBD) Share % Eff.
1 @emperorofnaps 63 13 8 127,35 0,41 0,11
2 @booster 64 8 2 140,49 0,45 0,08
3 @oceanwhale 52 12 13 43,61 0,14 0,04
4 @estabond 36 16 12 33,09 0,11 0,04
5 @boomerang 18 9 8 66,42 0,21 0,04
6 @tipu 25 13 5 49,22 0,16 0,04
7 @upmewhale 7 1 53 246,74 0,79 0,02
8 @lrd 23 9 27 29,72 0,1 0,02
9 @sleeplesswhale 57 8 64 30,82 0,1 0,02

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work increases the interest in the discussion, gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit and makes existing users remain.

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.

#bisteemit #statistics #steemit-stats #steemit #busy
Payout: 0.000 HBD
Votes: 24
More interactions (upvote, reblog, reply) coming soon.