https://youtu.be/2R76VbYdHTE?si=rbrxQvkIQO935Iy8
Beneath the glossy Netflix banner, this documentary didn’t feel like entertainment to me. It felt like a slow suffocation, the kind you endure when watching something so wrong that your body tells you to turn it off, yet your mind forces you to keep going. I wasn’t pulled in by suspense or craft, but by the horror of recognizing how fragile trust really is. What disturbed me wasn’t simply the harassment, but the revelation that the predator wasn’t hiding in the shadows of the internet. The predator was inside the home, shaping every text, every violation, with a face the victim thought was love.
Coming to terms with that twist is where the film punches hardest. At first, the story is dressed like a classic catfishing case: teens targeted by a faceless tormentor, thousands of messages dripping with threats and sexual rot. Then the mask drops. The mother herself engineered the harassment, stretching it over months like a form of psychological warfare against her own daughter. That realization is heavier than any murder mystery or true crime twist I’ve seen on screen. Watching it, I felt more disgusted than surprised. The betrayal didn’t need dramatization; it already carried the weight of a personal apocalypse.
Doubt creeps in as you watch Lauryn, the daughter, speak with restraint that feels almost unreal. She doesn’t scream or demand pity. She sits with the exhaustion of someone who has been drained beyond outrage. That quiet presence unnerved me more than the explicit details. When someone that young can barely summon anger anymore, you see the real damage: not just fear, but erosion of spirit. And that is the part of the documentary I can’t shake. It doesn’t matter that the mother was sentenced and later released; the sentence doesn’t balance the scale when the wound is still bleeding in front of you.
Every detail of the documentary’s pacing irritated me at first. It lingers too long, repeats points, lets silence fill space. Normally I’d call that sloppy editing. Here, though, the drag has meaning. The monotony mimics the grind of harassment—every day, another flood of vile texts, every night the dread of a new notification. By refusing to let viewers escape, the film mirrors the inescapable loop Lauryn lived through. That’s not stylish filmmaking; it’s a direct confrontation. If you’re impatient, it punishes you with the same frustration victims felt. And in that sense, the form itself becomes part of the violence.