Warren Buffett stayed in the market 60 years and he is retiring a billionaire. Some countries have aged to such yet there are still flaws of underdevelopment. One man against a nation in terms of progress, who has the higher chances? You have to look at the abundance of differences.
We have to admit, the easiest way to predict the future is from what is seen at present. Let's say for instance, you planted corn this month, one can say there will be corn harvest some months to come. What happens when nothing is planted?. This is something disheartening.
In this article we will be centering on the government and how those who have taken these official seats (most of them) have turned out to be a disappointment. I once talked about how governmenting is one big business but very few who rise to this rank understand.
source
Maybe, just maybe this party of thing should not exist. I know! I know!!, seems very unprofessional. But what has been the fate of the people in the face of professionalism? The summary of underdevelopment is always that the government is not working. Very right, yet we have to look at something else in between; lack of continuity and it boils down to partism.
You should be getting a glimpse of where we are going by NOW. Political parties from inception were created to be a form of checks and balances and also lift monopolism or party monarchy of the scene.
Nevertheless, it has come with one flaw that is becoming very difficult to curve currently. We are talking of exclusiveness. One party takes up power from the other and the next thing is to put their own structures in place and neglect the former.
What the former spent 4 to 8 years trying to build becomes obsolete and the Circle starts over again. The idea is always to prove that the predecessor had nothing positive to offer. This in turn causes the masses to suffer. How can you abandon a long standing project for a newer one in the short term. First, how long will you be in office to finish up yours.
source
Politics in many parts of the world is becoming a broken system to the detriment of its citizens. Why not take one thing at a time and just make sure it is nailed? Ok, this is just me shouting out myself, these people are just satisfied in making the most of what they term ‘their turn’.
Never projects are brought in so the country's finances can be milked. The follow up actions are to check the flaws of the predecessors and waste another extra money pushing headline cases that adds absolutely nothing to the masses. **
Partism has become more of a black market where politicians side to show hatred and disunity. This is why a country has existed for more than 5 to 6 decades without anything tangible to show for. So many things are broken in between, we should be aware of this wise proverb; ‘a house divided amongst itself cannot stand’---Lord Jesus.
To conclude, let me add, this is why I said many remain hopeless even when they are being teased with words like ‘a brighter future awaits our country’. We ALL hope for this, it is what every good citizen should dream and pray for. Nevertheless, when there is a ‘break even’ after every four to eight years it becomes tiring. I mean, everyone is aging, why keep raising citizens hopes without consistency?.
One of the most difficult tasks you can be given is putting humans together. The future of every country is dependent on unity. Every vision can be executed when consistency is applied irrespective of who takes over. The idea is never to please self but the masses. This was the reason why citizens went to the polls; something even large to consider when talking about if this votes even counts. The world system is experiencing so many breaking points.
Posted Using INLEO