Money is The Motive and The Rest is Just a Story With Little Truth About Steem Blockchain!!!

The new rules have a good side and the goal is for Steem value to grow but in practice, something else is happening. Instead of constructive dialogue with reason, we see the insult, instead of conversation we see the repression of fear. It is basically good to support others and grow, but in practice, this is impossible because the source of money (Steem) is limited. We also see that voice sharing is taking place on another level, people with Steem Power are supporting people, not quality posts. One team suppresses fear and writes half-truths, and those are worse than lies. If you do not love the hands of these strong players then it turns out that you have been punished, that you do not have the quality of writing, while some posts where they write nonsense from the same people become rewarded as being bestsellers. There is no need to wage war, let the rules be set by the software itself, you can't vote for yourself, you have to vote for 100 different people a day, etc. I get sick when someone walks a dog and has a $ 30 reward for a post, it's a miss because the character is not a Madonna so we follow the paparazzi.  I have to mention that investors who have Steem Power are the people who hold the value of this system, everyone else makes money because they exist. Those who came up with this system may think that the war will spark attention and that many will invest in Steem power because they want to take revenge on someone, if that is true, I think a negative campaign is damaging the credibility of Steem Blockchain. Also, the only way to raise Steem value is to have more users, more investors and more companies that accept Steem as a value system. When someone comes out of the way and we explain to him that Steemit is full of genuine and quality posts that are rewarding, then the reality arises where disgusting posts are in the best places. Then the whole story of quality falls into the water, if so then we should have a commission and standards for what is a good post on a particular topic, and here the car mechanic evaluates poetry, the historian evaluates blockchain technology, etc. The truth is, there are interest and lobby groups that stick together and share the votes with their fans. Insert the principle that we have to vote for new users every day and then everything will be much more practical and better, don't make people have to listen to you. Don't make excuses in us, where the promises are that we will get a free Steem token two years ago, why did we lose big money? I have invested over $ 100,000 and now I have $ 25,000, tell me why many have lost money, we have invested and trusted and still believe that you can make Steem blockchain much better and more profitable.  It is impossible for us to expand and increase our membership with the support of Steem Power. If you have one kilogram of gold then you can give 100 gr per 10 people, or 100 people per 10 gr etc. The same thing happens with Steem, the resource is limited and a platform for Steem tokens needs to be created so we can support one billion people as well as FB. The second part of the story is one that relates to having two types of people, promoters and those who are good writers. This means that someone has the talent to gather 100 or a thousand people, but if he is not a good writer or if he does not have the money to invest in Steem Power he has no chance of becoming successful. So it's a good idea to have a reward system for those who bring in new people, I would set aside a budget that follows those who bring in new users and investors, or it would make a profit in several depths and instead of 50 - 50 I would give 25 - 25 - 50 and then they would have a rapid expansion of the system. Here, few people listen to ideas, make projects, and at least have someone ask you or think about ideas or what their story goes forward, the ego is the greatest killer of intelligence.  My goal is for everyone to be equally rewarded, for the system to give everyone an equal chance, and for there to be no lobby groups that support bad posts. The first thing is to make rules that protect the interests of all 1. That you should not vote for your post, 2. That you must vote for other people every day for the next 30 days, 3. Introduce a Steem Platform with realistic tokens that they have value in money, 4. To put a ban on the personal list instead of a downvote, 5. To introduce a referral system that rewards users who bring investors, companies and other users to our ecosystem. Everything can change, but mostly those who don't have Steem Power attack those who have Steem power, and that causes hatred and divides society. This is, unfortunately, a false revolution and the bad reputation we promote, in my opinion, this is a heavy blow to the system as it is a court of a personal nature and the posts that are awarded have nothing to do with quality except for a few exceptions. We need to talk, find the right solutions because we all want the value of Steem to jump, to recover the lost money and to make money. P.S. Everyone on the Steem Schools discord channel https://discord.gg/aSRrrMt who writes a post on how to make better Steem and increase value will receive support from me.