Earlier today, I was struck by how differently children approach food. My 20-month-old daughter nearly finished a portion of noodles that may satiate an adult, while my 6-year-old eats only a fraction of what her younger sibling does. Add to that my friend’s 3-year-old son, who can clear a plate faster than I can, and the contrast becomes even sharper. Why such variation in appetite among children? Is it purely genetics, or does upbringing set the tone?
This classic nature versus nurture debate has been extensively studied in child nutrition research, and the evidence points to a powerful interaction between the two.
Genetics: The Appetite Blueprint
Scientific studies consistently show that appetitive traits are highly heritable. Twin studies are particularly revealing because they allow researchers to separate genetic effects from environmental ones.
A landmark twin study by John Hopkins in 2008, of 8 to 11-year-olds found that satiety responsiveness is about 63% heritable, while responsiveness to food cues is about 75% heritable. Another study of 10-year-olds confirmed that traits like food enjoyment, food responsiveness, and eating pace have strong genetic bases, while only certain tendencies, like emotional under-eating—appear more influenced by the environment.
Even picky eating shows a strong genetic component. A recent twin study by The Guardian reported that up to 74% of the variation in picky eating among children can be explained by genes. From this perspective, my daughter’s strong appetite may well be written into her biology. Some children are naturally predisposed to feel hungrier, take longer to feel full, or be more responsive to food stimuli.
Environment: The Appetite Stage
Genes, however, are not destiny. The environment, what scientists call the “shared” and “non-shared” environment, modulates these genetic predispositions. A comprehensive review conducted in 2019 concluded that child appetitive traits are both heritable and environmentally shaped, and that early environments can amplify or dampen genetic tendencies.
Family feeding practices play a major role. For instance, pressuring a child to finish everything on the plate often backfires, weakening their natural satiety cues. Conversely, structured, pressure-free meals help children regulate appetite better o this British Journal of Nutrition. Emotional climate also matters. Research shows that emotional under-eating is influenced more by shared family environments than genes, suggesting that stress, parental anxiety, or family mealtime atmosphere can override biological appetite signals.
In short, nurture can either encourage children to listen to their internal hunger cues or distort those signals over time.
Nature Meets Nurture
The interplay between genetics and environment is not one-sided. In fact, scientists now speak of gene–environment interactions. For example, a child genetically predisposed to high food responsiveness may only show that trait strongly if they grow up in an environment with abundant, palatable foods. Similarly, a child who is genetically more satiety-sensitive might be encouraged to eat more if pressured, weakening that protective genetic factor.
This is also where gene–environment correlation comes into play. Children who show stronger appetites may evoke certain responses from parents, such as being offered larger portions or more frequent snacks, which in turn reinforces their natural tendencies.
My Noodle Story, Revisited
Looking back at my daughter’s noodle feast, I see more than just a hearty appetite. I see an interaction between nature and nurture in real time. She may have inherited a strong drive to eat, though that can't be from me, but my decision to stop feeding her, recognizing that toddlers don’t always self-regulate perfectly, was an environmental factor. Likewise, my 6-year-old’s lighter appetite might reflect both genetic predispositions and the more cautious feeding approaches we used when he was younger.
To the ultimate question
So, are people “born eaters,” or do they become one? The answer is both. Genetics provides the blueprint, setting the hunger thresholds and satiety responsiveness, while the environment scripts how those traits unfold over a lifetime.
For parents, this should be an encouraging news. While we cannot rewrite DNA, we can create environments, calm, structured, and pressure-free, that help children develop healthier eating patterns, regardless of their genetic predispositions.
Next time my daughter eagerly reaches for another bite, I’ll remember that her appetite may be part of her biology, but how I guide her through it is entirely up to me.
Posted Using INLEO