_{(Photos - Credit: Candace Owens)}

"Imagine if you and me; could learn to see each other as one family; same roots, same tree; imagine what tomorrow could be." - Jah Sun, Hold a Vibe

"You know the hate's been winning, but the lovers ain't done." - Skip Marley, Lions

"Blessed are the peacemakers." - Charlie Kirk on June 19, 2025

It's now been over a month since the public assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10th, but the energetic shock-wave that rippled out in the wake of that horrific tragedy is still reverberating through the collective human consciousness, and may well continue to do so for many more weeks and perhaps months to come. The whole nation felt it at some level, the trauma of seeing a fellow American and human being brutally and publicly executed while speaking to a crowd of onlookers at a Utah university, the gruesome scene of the murder live-streamed for the whole world to see. At the energetic level, something massive shifted that day, and though this abhorrent act of darkness was itself clearly a blatantly negative action, it appears that Charlie's death nevertheless somehow managed to trigger a massive positive energetic shift in the collective human consciousness. In weaving together this comprehensive deep dive, my aim was to explore the nature of this event and the shift it triggered from a deeper, more spiritual perspective than many others, sharing much of the insight I’ve personally gained into this uniquely catalyzing and intriguing multi-faceted story.

Fruit of the Divisive Polarization Agenda Tearing our Nation Apart, Catalyst for Unity

The Dark Side of course immediately jumped to utilize this tragedy to further sow the seeds of fear, hatred and division amongst us, as the establishment system of control always does with every major corporate news headline in its bid to control and enslave humanity. So it is that those identified with both the left and the right sought to capitalize on this human tragedy for their own selfish political purposes, the left-right two-party political paradigm being one of the most prominent and powerful tools weaponized against Americans by the forces of darkness operating on our planet.

The hate spewed against Charlie among many of those on the left was pervasive in the days following his death, with some even celebrating his murder. The right, meanwhile, sought to depict the assassination exclusively as a result of the rise of 'radical leftist terrorism' supported by the Democratic 'elite', and the entire political right-wing as the party of peace and the good guys. Both divisive narratives played right into the Divide and Conquer strategy of the establishment system of control.

Insanity from the left...

Across social media, there was a wave of diatribes of seemingly mindless hate directed at Charlie, as if to justify or downplay his gruesome public assassination. Among these accusations were that Charlie was a racist, bigoted, misogynist, homophobic, transphobic, Islamophobic, Nazi, genocide apologist, etc, etc, etc. Below are just a few examples among many such social media posts, all sharing the racist accusation.

He was allegedly "an evil and dangerous person, the absolute worst of the worst," despite he and his platform consistently and frequently facilitating dialogue between those of differing political views, and despite never calling for violence against those fellow Americans with whom he disagreed:

https://x.com/AZCapsFan/status/1965869870341599540

Being a longtime supporter of Israel he was allegedly “a whole genocide apologist,” also “anti anything human rights” despite consistently championing the basic human rights to life and free speech, and was naturally also “very racist,” because apparently pretty much everyone in that particular camp is utterly convinced this claim is true.

https://x.com/FULLTIMEVAMPlRE/status/1965876924703715454

X User @queenadeIeslays was frustrated that some people out there believe we should have empathy for Charlie in the wake of his untimely death, primarily because he "supported the genocide" and Israeli slaughter of Palestinian civilians it would seem, describing such compassionate souls as "a lost cause!"

https://x.com/queenadeIeslays/status/1966028948225298684

Now I at least understand and empathize with those who, out of compassion for the suffering of humanity, take issue with Charlie’s support of Israel during its blatant, two-year, US-sponsored genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. I, too, took issue with that stance, though I can also see that this former stance of his was radically shifting in the final months of his life on earth. Perhaps many of those accusing Charlie of supporting the genocide and defending the senseless slaughter of children in Gaza are simply ignorant of this fact, that in the final months of his life the death and suffering of innocents in Gaza - particularly the children - weighed heavy on his heart, and that his support of Israel was quickly diminishing as a result, and that he publicly questioned and criticized Israeli policy in a number of ways on multiple occasions.

Charlie's shifting stance on Israel

In a podcast interview on October 12, 2023, all the way back at the very beginning of the war, not only did he publicly warn that Israel’s war campaign would be an “ethnic cleansing” of Gaza, but went so far as to seriously question the official October 7 narrative, suggesting there may have been an Israeli stand-down order leading to the high casualty rate of Israelis used as the pretext for the two-year-and-counting genocidal ethnic cleansing campaign.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/3DiuIKLsd-E

This was while Charlie was still 100% pro-Israel, and before the genocidal results of the war began to be increasingly obvious for all to see. It was this open-mindedness and willingness to question even the same state of Israel that his own deeply held religious beliefs taught him were 'God's chosen', which ultimately led to what Candace Owens describes as the "spiritual transformation" culminating in his defection from the Zionist pro-Israel ranks of American politics just two days before he was assassinated.

As his public support of Israel began to waver in recent months, Charlie suggested that Jeffrey Epstein was, as evidence suggests, working for the Israeli Mossad, even publicly defying Trump by challenging the President to release the Epstein files as he once promised but now refuses to do. He also began to question and push back against the Zionist influence and control of American media, publicly venting his anger at being attacked by Zionists within the pro-Israel lobby simply for asking relevant questions that most Americans are beginning to ask, and engaging with America-first conservatives who are critical of Israeli policy and Zionist influence over this nation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2qn0mvSCig

“I have less ability… to criticize the Israeli government than actual Israelis do. And that’s really, really weird.”

After all, Charlie was in recent months before his death also giving a platform to and engaging with notoriously popular anti-Israel voices such as comedian Dave Smith and newscaster Tucker Carlson, which infuriated his Zionist donors and handlers to no end.

https://x.com/LibertasRedux/status/1943839414662443292

Perhaps most notably of all, Tucker Carlson has since revealed in an interview with Megyn Kelly that Charlie even paid Donald Trump a personal visit at the White House over the summer in a bold move to lobby the President against joining Israel's war on Iran, in complete defiance of Israeli PM Netanyahu and his own Zionist donors.

https://x.com/LegendaryEnergy/status/1966534598822658329

In fact, just 48 hours before his assassination, Charlie even announced in writing, in a group text thread that has since been made public by Candace Owens and confirmed as authentic by Turning Point spokesman Andrew Kolvett, that due to bullying by the Israeli lobby ("Jewish donors"), he was forced to abandon the pro-Israel cause.

After venting his frustration at losing yet another Zionist donor of $2 million a year over his refusal to "cancel Tucker" - the single largest and most popular independent conservative media voice in America - and stating that he was "thinking of inviting" the staunchly anti-Israel conservative media personality Candance Owens; Charlie made the unequivocal declaration that: "I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause."

That so many prominent pro-Israel voices such as Laura Loomer for days vehemently denied Candace's initial claims that Charlie had made these statements, is probably worth noting. That one of these prominent voices of denial was also one of those Zionist influencers closest to Charlie who also happened to be one of the eight people actually on that text thread and thus privy to this decision, is highly suspect and surely worth looking deeper into...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Riv3I7D0Yk&t

And when Candace finally did release the proof, Zionist players close to Charlie who clearly appear to have betrayed him were shown to be the deceptive liars that they truly are, while those attempting to cling to the false narrative they had for so long been parroting were made to look like the propaganda tools that they are...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5autG89PW6w&t

This Zionist bullying over hosting Tucker Carlson appears to have simply been the final nail in the coffin of Charlie's support for "the pro-Israel cause," and the declaration that followed as a result of it the culmination of an intense inner struggle underlying a major shift he'd been going through for months now. Charlie was, like so many of his own supporters and fellow American Christian Zionists, questioning his once staunch support for genocidal Israel as he traversed a difficult journey of awakening. Charlie was quite clearly in the process of awakening to the truly dark and evil nature of the secular state of Israel, the Zionist ideology of hate and supremacism underlying it, and the Israel lobby's influence and control over US media and politics.

We may never know exactly how far along this awakening journey he truly was, but it is undeniable that he was far enough along to make the groundbreaking decision to "leave the pro-Israel cause." And it was this documented choice to abandon the pro-Israel cause he had once so proudly championed that so many millions of Americans naturally now see as the most likely and obvious motive behind his assassination...

Indeed, long before the text-message evidence of this controversial decision of Charlie’s was made public, red flags suggesting a wider conspiracy and cover-up abounded. In an early report covering the ridiculous nature of the ‘official’ narrative of the Charlie Kirk assassination, independent newscaster Kim Iversen explains why the vast majority of freethinking Americans were from the very start questioning and refusing to blindly accept such an implausible and nonsensical narrative as the one offered up by the establishment:

https://youtu.be/6gNPJADBUUI?si=Cg3tGgrn1TkydMUp

This radical shift away from supporting "the pro-Israel cause" that Charlie was undeniably undergoing, his refusal to accept Israeli PM Netanyahu's funding offer (bribe) aimed at keeping him in the Zionist fold, as well as his fears of the pro-Israel forces around him were all documented in the immediate aftermath of his death in a highly illuminating piece written by independent journalists Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil, published at The GrayZone.

And if Charlie's pivot away from his previous support of genocidal Israel was almost immediately obvious to numerous left-wing journalists and commentators - from Max Blumenthal to The Young Turks to Jimmy Dore - then it would seem that only ignorance can be to blame for the host of leftist social media warriors out there spewing the nonsense that Charlie should receive no empathy and perhaps even deserved to die because of his unwavering support for Israeli genocide. The indoctrination of those still plugged into the matrix programming is surely to blame for such ignorance, ignorance that's responsible for breeding such blind hatred as that being spewed by so many in the days and weeks following the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

Humanity needs empathy, not ignorance

But even if this man were truly as vile and hateful and cold-hearted as such social media posts would have the world believe, he would nevertheless still remain a fellow human being just like the rest of us; deserving of all the same human rights, compassion, and empathy that each one of us expects and deserves as a living, breathing, sentient human being upon this planet. After all, each one of us has our own unique set of thoughts, feelings, traumas, desires, strengths, weaknesses, beliefs, worldviews and childhood programming - childhood programming that shapes our beliefs, worldviews and such in this crazy world - and Charlie was no exception.

So in response to those mocking the millions of thoughtful Americans who prayed for Charlie and encouraged empathy rather than hate in the wake of his assassination, regardless of their own political views: No, we are not "supposed to have empathy for him because a bunch of white americans idolized him." We should rather have empathy for him simply because he was a fellow human being just like us, heavily programmed and indoctrinated from his youth into a particular set of beliefs just like the rest of us, and who cared deeply about his friends and loved ones, just like the rest of us. We should have empathy because he was violently taken from this earth and ripped from his friends and family, because he was killed in cold blood despite not being engaged in violence himself but rather in dialogue and debate.
You see, this is the problem with the polarizing programming in America right now, that it is being used to subtly and in some cases even overtly dehumanize anyone and everyone we disagree with. And that level of polarization leads us straight into this downward spiraling cycle of bitter hate and division that leads us nowhere but here, into this dark abyss ruled by fear, hate, dehumanization and violence.

I don't see a racist here...

Of all the hateful accusations laid out against Charlie, the one I find the most nonsensical also ironically appears to be the most pervasive, that Charlie Kirk was a racist. But in answer to this I must ask: What man who is truly a racist or white supremacist among us actually has close friends who are black? And how is it that this supposedly racist hater of women was close friends with not only black Americans, but a black woman to boot? Can anyone in their right mind see a racist in this picture?

As it turns out, despite personally disagreeing with a great many of Charlie's political views, I have managed to find one such view on which I am in very firm agreement, a view which also adds to the absurdity of the claim that this man was in fact a racist: The scientifically supported view that race based upon skin color and used to divide the one and only single race of humanity - the human race - is an illusory social construct; which, by the way, Charlie also clearly stated he was trying to break us all free from.

https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1969077889619427757

Now, did Charlie say some pretty ignorant things at times? I certainly think so, as do most of us humans at some point in our lives believe and repeat some pretty ignorant nonsense. Did he sow division with some of his most inflammatory statements? It certainly would appear that way. But does that make him 'evil' to the core and deserving to be violently murdered for these so-called 'radical' and at times absolutely politically incorrect beliefs? Well, for all those who truly believe in free speech and human equality, the answer is obviously no. And those who would answer yes are the same double minded souls who believe violence is both justified and good, even deserving of praise when carried out against the enemy and the 'bad guys', but a totally unjustified evil deserving of punishment when carried out against themselves...

Mocking a dead man and celebrating the cold-blooded murder of a nonviolent activist...

A number of others mocked Charlie's death, with countless posts making fun of the fact that someone who defended Americans' right to keep and bear arms was killed by one of the very guns he supported private ownership of. And no matter one's reasoning and beliefs, it takes an utterly sick and depraved mind for one human being to plaster smiley face emojis on images of a public assassination of a fellow human being engaged in peaceful dialogue, just because that one disagrees with the political and/or religious views and beliefs of the one brutally murdered and violently taken from his friends and family, and indeed from us all.

_{(https://x.com/oorer007da/status/1966193666898420170)}

That such posts were far from isolated is a sad reality, however their popularity seems to highlight that they are by no means representative of the views of the majority, and the possibility should not be ruled out that some number of such mindless posts are in fact bots and not human beings at all, or paid agents of chaos... As an example suggestive of this theory, we can see a word-for-word identical post to the one above from an entirely different account, both of which have an incredibly high ratio of views to likes, perhaps suggesting a manufactured view boosting with the algorithms, and certainly showing how few of those viewing this drivel actually support the hate it is designed to foment.

https://x.com/capellan_isidro/status/1966356073293427080

Nevertheless, there is clearly a sizeable number of real peo