Ok finally I took the time to show the world what I already knew, that LasseCash is very decentralized in ownership... now lets take a look at the DISTRIBUTION on LasseCash, I exclude @lassecash as its only for inflation for the first 10 years (as stated day 1, read details here www.lassecash.com/about), I exclude @lasseehlers as its the leaders account that always should have a lot to be able to resolve disputes amoung other stuff and I exclude @null for obvious reasons:
Take a look at top 250 which is a lot of users on such a small crypto product:
Now compare that with Hive: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets.
Now compare that with Bitcoin: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets (Excluded Satoshi's wallets).
Now compare to HEX: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets (Excluded OA's wallets).
Now compare to LEO: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets.
Now this is a very fast analysis and there is many ways to do this, but I think this is very earnest. LasseCash is VERY decentralized in ownership compared to Hive, HEX, Bitcoin and LEO. Now I know you dont like HEX, but many people do and it will do a 10000X.
So yes LasseCash looks very decentralized in ownership!
Lets ask Grok 3 for a fast analysis:
summarize the distribution of tokens in the biggest cryptos compared to LasseCash, 2 lines https://www.lassecash.com/@lasseehlers/conclusion-lassecash-very-decentralized-in-ownership
Searched for "token distribution concentration top holders Bitcoin Ethereum HEX PulseChain" 10 results
Show All (2)
Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (top 100 holders control ~15-20% of supply), Ethereum (staking contracts and exchanges hold ~80%, with Beacon Deposit at 50%), and HEX on PulseChain (top 10% holders control ~65%, with founder-linked addresses at ~90%) exhibit high concentration, while LEO and Hive show moderate decentralization (top 100k ~85-95%). In contrast, LasseCash demonstrates superior decentralization in ownership, with its top 250 wallets (excluding founder and inflation accounts) holding a far smaller share than comparable groups in Hive, Bitcoin, HEX, and LEO, promoting broader distribution among holders.
LasseCash demonstrates superior decentralization in ownership
Posted using LasseCash