Occultic Foundations
The previous chapter (which will be shared in due course) documented how (under the auspices of Operation Gladio) European fascist militias were interconnected with the CIA, the Reagan/Bush administration, and were oft financed by US banking interests such as J.P Morgan. It also documented how they were under the control of synarchy-inspired Masonic lodges. This chapter focuses on the occultic heritage of synarchy, observing how an intersecting conflux of self-aggrandising agendas are being drawn toward a singularity. Whilst not every element is on the same page, each component is manifesting a singular narrative.
Beyond the self-imposed confines of their psychopathic, sociopathic, narcissistic, and megalomania-fuelled echo chambers, the vast majority of entities discussed in this series are being exploited as a means of fulfilling a broader ambition. In essence, this is the true nature of the control mechanism, for it weaponises our idealisms, weaknesses, and negative traits, then turns them loose upon us. Thus, at a deeply occultic level, the entire system is akin to a self-reflective edifice of humanity's naivety, negligence, iniquity, and complicit culpability.
Synarchy
I would like to remind the reader that within many sects, societies, and lodges, the public-facing outer ripple (the perception) oft unknowingly safeguards an inner circle that is a shielded inversion of its public persona. Although the vast majority of influential orders were heavily infiltrated and indeed constructed for the specific purposes described in this article, I readily acknowledge that not every associated individual had a nefarious motive. My focus (as always) remains on the interweaving narrative and principles that are concealed by the mantras and objectives of the moment.
The art of illuminism lay in enlisting dupes as well as adepts, and by encouraging the dreams of honest visionaries or the schemes of fanatics, by flattering the vanity of ambitious egoists, by working on unbalanced brains, or by playing on such passions as greed of gold or power, to make men of totally divergent aims serve the purpose of the sect. World Revolution by Nesta Webster.
The inner narrative is both covert and centralised within the hands of its architects. The enablers/administrators (irrespective of their perceived importance or worldly power) are compartmentalised aspects of it. At all times, the architects remain veiled - harnessing the interchangeable polarities of the right and left, love and hate, good and evil, war and peace, the darkness and the light - as a means of furthering their ambition. A singular objective deconstructed into false dichotomies and compartmentalised entities whose agreement and opposition are bringing the agenda to fruition. Self-contained fragments of a singular narrative that play to the nature of the egregore/group mind - as previously stated:
Perceptualflaws
The ideology of the aforementioned Jean Violet-connected Cagoule (the hooded ones) and the fascistic Masonic P2 lodge, utilised a synarchist template and was influenced by the synarchistic revolutionary movement. The secret society emanating philosophy of synarchy was popularised by Christian mystic, Kabbalist, and influential Theosophist, Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre. His key influence being the pre-eminent occultist Antoine Fabre d'Olivet. His marriage to Countess Marie de Riznitch-Keller, connecting him to the upper echelons of the aristocracy.
P2 was sometimes referred to as a "state within a state" or a "shadow government". Source
The chair of the East India Company we discussed in part two was Lord Shelburne - an individual who was also concurrently funding and promoting the formative Freemasonic and occultic elements of the synarchist movement.
Although I am very much opposed to the hidden hand of synarchy, a caveat that I want to add is that whilst the synarchist agenda is an interpretation, having read Saint-Yves I'd suggest he was more idealistic than fascistic. Still, it is both pertinent and prescient to highlight that both egocentric and influential idealism is most certainly another tool in the armoury of the control mechanism. Equally, as per the nature of the secret society, it is also pertinent to note that many associated individuals would have had both a public and a private persona - history recording the former.
So what was the synarchist philosophy? Borrowing from eastern social stratifications, Saint Yves envisioned a caste-driven (feudal) theocracy. In essence, his synarchy was his answer to the polarity of anarchy, comprising a world ruled by an enlightened elite and governed by the initiates of a priest class that was in dialogue with spiritual intelligence's. Thus, synarchy could be understood as a form of spiritually motivated deep state. Indeed, Saint Yves believed he was in direct communion with the same spiritual entities that became synonymous with the writings of Madame Blavatsky, and the Lucis Trust's Alice Bailey - the latter of which is now recognised as the "spiritual foundation" of the United Nations.
"Synarchy - is government by secret societies or by a group of initiates who operate from behind the scenes. It is an analogue of theocracy or rule by a priesthood." Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d'Alveydre - Synarchy, Keys to the East
As highlighted in Saint-Yves book "Synarchy, Keys to the East" Synarchy equated to a supranational system of jurisdiction, a United States of Europe whose formative ambition connects us to the aforementioned Otto Von-Hapsburg's Pan Europa Union (and his pretensions for a Hapsburg-headed rebirth of the Roman Empire), the later European Union, and the base structure of global governance. His vision comprising a technocratic corporate government (bound together by a metaphysical chamber) whose three councils of commerce, law, and science, would be under the control of hand-picked experts.
‘Yet as we have seen from dozens of checkable associations and links, it seems that at least the concept of the European Union is the product of an occult conspiracy, inspired by individuals who believed they were in contact with spirit entities, with the ultimate aim of establishing a full-blown United States of Europe in line with Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre’s original vision.’ The Sion Revelation
Synarchistic governance would comprise of an equilibrium between the three separate forces of economy, legislation, and culture.
At a base level the governance structure of synarchy resembles the "inclusive" communion of communitarianism. Within the (refined) communitarian system of governance, all become incrementally absorbed into one. Comparatively, the philosophy of synarchy can be equated with the "association of everyone with everyone else". Both occupying a paradoxical radical middle ground that is born of a synthesis between two fundamental contradictions. This is again due to the Hermetic/Theosophic/Kabbalistic (I refer the reader to the union of oppositions that operates behind the veil of dialecticism) influences that were interwoven with d’Alveydre's pseudo-Judeo-Christian theology.
He developed the term Synarchy—the association of everyone with everyone else—into a political philosophy, and his ideas about this type of government proved influential in politics and the occult. Source
At an occultic level, synarchy alludes to an attempt at reattaining the lost golden age of Chronos (Saturn), and the new Atlantis they believe they're re-creating. Equally, it bears more than a scant resemblance to the ancient Egyptian governance structures of divine kings and priesthood. Indeed, as per the Martinist influence within the French Revolution and the Enlightenment, Synarchy should be understood as a continuation of an objective - as opposed to a starting point.
Saint-Yves claimed that in the ancient past an advanced civilisation – based, of course, on synarchic principles – had governed the whole world. This golden age lasted from 7500 to 4000 BCE, before imploding due to a global catastrophe. Source
Page 17: The Secret Doctrine of the Rosicrucians by Magus Incognito dated 1918.
As I will document and expand upon throughout subsequent chapters, their conception of a "golden age" - is little more than a smokescreen for collectivist form of totalitarianism - i.e communitarianism, or from a spiritual perspective - oneism. Indeed, alongside the "all in one" philosophy of the oligarchy, I pause to note that the below historical observations resemble the World Economic Forum's "Great Reset" and its accompanying mantra, "you will own nothing and be happy". Replace the words "Great Reset" (dark/left) with "Great Awakening" (light/right) and you can begin to comprehend the nature of the synthesis. Certainly, if you keep people in the dark for long enough, it's fairly obvious that they will search for the light. Thus, by controlling both polarities, the architect can blind the mind-eye to the totality of the deception.
"Good is on the right, evil on the left, but supreme excellence is above both." Page 46: Transcendental Magick its Doctrine & Ritual by Eliphas Levi.
The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.“ - Vladimir Lenin.
The below was written by Roman historian Marcus Junianus Justinus.
The first inhabitants of Italy were the Aborigines, whose king, Saturn, is said to have been a man of such extraordinary justice, that no one was a slave in his reign, or had any private property, but all things were common to all, and undivided, as one estate for the use of everyone; in memory of which way of life, it has been ordered that at the Saturnalia slaves should everywhere sit down with their masters at the entertainments, the rank of all being made equal. Source
In contrast, I have taken the below quotation from the doctrines of the Fraturnis Saturni - note its congruence with synarchy.
In the Saturnian view, there does seem, to be sure, a dark side of the Age of Aquarius. Based on some fairly objectively interpreted astrological teachings, it could be concluded that the Aquarian Age will only appear to be one of rational and humanitarian egalitarianism. The Saturno-Uranian reality looming behind this world of appearances will be one of an enlightened system of control by a ruling elite—the final reign of the Illuminati. Page 52: Fire & Ice: The Brotherhood of Saturn by Stephen Flowers.
“A fascist is he who willfully abandons his own will in favour of the Guide’s will, so that the Guide’s will be promptly realised” Bernito Mussolini
Defining characteristics of synarchy/fascism and communitarianism is the rule of elites, how individual interests are subordinated to the good of the nation - or in terms of communitarianism, the environment, and the global to local community. Within a synarchistic society, the individual would have a predetermined place, purpose, and specific function, with social symmetry (see the Agenda 2030 buzzwords of inclusivity and harmony) attained through strict adherence to this structure. Circumvention of these principles would be dangerous to both the individual and the social body, thus challenges to a person's selected status would not be tolerated. Those with an inability to fulfill a function and purpose, would be perceived as a drain on society.
Now wouldn't that be a brave new world, eh Aldous?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03MZG9vK0W8
Depending on your perspective, the one world values behind the Agenda 2030 mantra of “nobody left behind” is either a humanitarian promise or a threat that points to the totalitarian nature of its communitarian architecture. Recalling chapter one, as per synarchy, the communitarian process speaks to an alchemical/dialecticism that is derived from the base principles of Hermeticism - and its later syncretism with Kabbalism, Theosophic mysticism, and Sabbateanism.
Leave no one behind (LNOB) is the central, transformative promise of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
The key difference between authoritarian communitarianism and synarchistic fascism, was that whilst the latter focused on European ultra-nationalism, we are now entering the era of one-world globalism. The current instigated clash of philosophical opposites (of right/nationalism and the unwitting left/globalism) intended to culminate in a new era of syncretism. Indeed, although the one-world agenda energises its philosophy and whitewashes its narrative against a polarity that equates the nationalist with the fascist, it's all part of a singular process. Nationalism an intended stepping stone toward internationalism and globalism.
As detailed in his book "Mysterium Iniquitas" author Pierre Virion documents that the pretensions of Synarchy stretched far beyond the European borders. Defining it as ...
As manufactured global crisis require globalist responses, suspicion, and frustration, condition an increasingly anxious public to the duplicity of premeditated salvation, note a psychological congruence with the aforementioned "strategy of tension".
A document known as the Synarchist Pact detailed a plan to infiltrate governments and then form a European Union. The below is taken from a French military intelligence report from 1941. Although they speak to its modern iteration, they define synarchy as ...
Whilst synarchy and the march toward a one-world order are largely dismissed as conspiracy theories, as displayed above, if you replace the original perception of a "priest-class" with technocrats and corporate entities, secret societies with NGOs and public bodies, you can observe the base synarchist template within the formative foundations of stakeholder capitalism. Staying with that thought, let's juxtapose the above statements against the World Economic Forum Wikipedia entry. Although the page has since been altered, it's no different to what they're telling us in their speeches and the templates of their stakeholder models.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qI0xQSn8Y0
“The world needs a new global architecture, additional layers of governance, to deal with issues that neither nations nor traditional forms of intergovernmental organizations can cope with.” Amitai Etzioni: Archived by Niki Rapana in her book "The Anti Communitarian manifesto."
As we shall cover later in the series, we can also note the WEF's connection to the Lucis Trust - and several other (financial and collaborative) thinks tanks, "grassroots" movements, religious bodies, new age/UN Gaia cults, and neopagan collectives - the vast majority of which are entangled with one another and have financial connections to all the usual suspects. That said, in the grand scheme of things, as the Club Of Rome slips behind the veil of public scrutiny, the one-world administrators of the WEF and individuals like Schwab are little more than the attention-grabbing bogeymen of the moment, a stye in the blink of an eye.
The overarching agenda/ideology is far more than the sum of its myriad parts, and vastly superior to its (dispensible) individual players. If you can point a finger at them and know their names, then know they are little more than the puppets of the moment.
[Source](https://www.startpage.com/av/proxy-image?piurl=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.istockphoto.com%2Fvectors%2Frainbow-coronavirus-vector-id1222731210%3Fk%3D20%26m%3D1222731210%26s%3D612x612%26w%3D0%26h%3DXLtPmzmJwIpyCQMM2rIoJzkLbvD2TaeEKLCW7CKnHes%3D&sp=1