This is an extensively expanded version of an article I wrote several years ago - but was never shared on #hive.
The Occultic Nature Of Law, Commerce and Legislation.
Legal maxims are established principles of law that are universally admitted. Source
At the opposing spectrum of transgression resides the law. To understand the esoteric nature of this statement is to know how the parasite class seek to control both sides of the equation. To observe how as malfeasance and immorality increase, commensurately, freedom decreases. Within the occultic law, the onus is upon the individual to understand the nature of the law and the rules of the game, failure to do so negates the responsibility of the deceiver. From that perspective, it is the self-responsibility of the deceived to carry out the work/research that enables them to make an informed choice. We each have God-given powers of deliberation, discernment, and intuition, it is your fault if you choose not to apply them.
Ignorantia juris non excusat - ignorance of law excuses no one.
“increase the body of knowledge which in the hands of competent technicians may be expected in time to result in substantial social control.” A Policy for the Advancement of Science: The Rockefeller Foundation, 1924-29
If you abandon reason/self-responsibility and blindly follow the leader, that is your problem. Ignorance of the law (and the fundamental nature of its principle) is neither an excuse nor a defense. Ignorance is not bliss, it is complicity in your enslavement. Hence we arrive at a time where people shun harsh truths and rush toward the embrace of a comforting lie.
“The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduces them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim." ― Gustave Le Bon
Legal Maxim: "He who fails to assert his rights, has none".
Notice how this is contrary to many popularised mantras. Have you also noticed how unquestionably repeating authoritatively echoed narratives is widely equated with intelligence? Whilst inconvenient questions are now perceived as scientific and moral negligence. Are the gurus of scientism and the new age leading you towards knowledge and enlightenment, or intellectual and spiritual impotence?
Legal Maxim: "I cannot approve and reject at the same time"
Concerning the fact that we are being incrementally nudged towards a position of reliance upon the financial (which is itself a stepping stone towards an intended universal wage) benevolence of government, the above is a very important point of law. Indeed, if you are the recipient of a state benefit, then you have given an implied agreement. The only way to stay outside the system is not to engage with it or accept benefits from it - this is going to become increasingly difficult. Equally, from a tacit perspective, paying into the system makes us complicit in the choices of said system.
Spinning within the socially buffeted windmills of the mind maze, externally downloaded information, the selective "expert opinion", and the shifting sands of the consensus, triumph over discernment, experience, intuition, self-responsibility, and wisdom.
Like black magic, statute law requires consent, but unless refuted, the power over the individual is assumed to be accepted. Ignoring the legal process (burying your head in the sand and returning legal matters to sender) is also taken as agreement.
He who is silent when he ought to have spoken and was able to, is taken to agree. Latin proverb
If you fail to claim/state your rights - you are considered to have relinquished them. The law carries the presumption of your incomprehension (submission) and thus will interact with you accordingly. Withholding knowledge is a tactic that has enabled the parasite class to monopolise their grip upon the earth. This control is manifested through the quasi-religious cult of the scribe and blindly administered through the compartmentalised priests of law.
Roman Maxim: He who would be deceived, let him be deceived.”
The Occulted Power of the Jury
Over literally thousands of years of deliberation, they have woven a web that is mystified, overly codified, obtuse, and indecipherable. Leaving the general public in a position of confusion, discombobulation, and a state of beguilement that relegates us to the status of herded helpless victims.
The law utilises the codified maxims of natural law to the benefit of those that are able to comprehend it's veiled implications.
Parliamentary sovereignty is a principle of the UK constitution. It makes Parliament the supreme legal authority in the UK, which can create or end any law. Generally, the courts cannot overrule its legislation and no Parliament can pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change. Parliamentary sovereignty is the most important part of the UK constitution. Parliament UK
The above is a demonstrable falsehood - in truth, it is the people who are the highest law council of the land. Most certainly, whilst occulted and obscured, there is a higher law that is able to govern the statute and legislative laws of government - in the UK this is known as constitutional law. Beyond the facade of voting for different faces of the same machine - this is the true essence of democracy, governance through the power of a jury. The right of the people to scrutinise the laws that shape their destiny.
The conclusion, therefore, is that any government that can for a day enforce its own laws without appealing to the people (or to a tribunal fairly representing the people) for their consent, is, in theory, an absolute government irresponsible to the people, and can perpetuate its power at pleasure. The trial by jury is based upon a recognition of this principle, and therefore forbids the government to execute any of its laws by punishing violators in any case whatever, without first getting the consent of'the country,' or the people, through a jury. In this way, the people at all times, hold their liberties in their own hands, and never surrender them, even for a moment, into the hands of the government. Lysander Spooner: Trial by Jury 1852
1: Demos = People 2: Cracy = Rule. Rule by the people.
Concering referendums and the democratic vote, it would be remiss not to point out the fly in the ointment - and it relates to the evolving nature of oligarchy sponsored activism and the consensus led control mechanism - i.e communitarianism. The belief that the majority holds some form of intellectual and/or moral authority, is a sleight of hand that is not only increasingly dangerous, it speaks to the nature of mind control, identity politics, emotionally reactive dispositions - and the manipulated path of least resistance (see Covid-19).
Within constitutional law, the government is held to account by a jury, which implies methodical contemplation, deliberation, and close scrutiny. A single juror also possesses the ability to nullify the case. This speaks to the concealed/diluted purpose/power of the jury, one that relates to the fact that jurors can judge both defendants and the legislation that has brought them to court. Thus, even if the defendant is found guilty of violating the legislation/statute that has brought them to judgement - if through their conscience the jury (including a single juror) considers it unfair to punish the defendant on that basis, they have a legal right of acquittal. Perhaps this is one of the true reasons why they are eroding the right to have a trial by jury.
Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of "Not Guilty" despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged. The jury in effect nullifies a law that it believes is either immoral or wrongly applied to the defendant whose fate they are charged with deciding. Source
The spanner in the works being that within communitarian law the judge now steers the jury. Thus, in matters of consequence - the jury is only allowed to see the side of the argument that benefits the Common good. Indeed, within communitarianism, the judge is now duty-bound to enforce the imposed top-down rules of the common good - i.e that which aligns with and supports the guiding principles and objectives of the system. Anything that is outside the predetermined common good - already carries an assumption of guilt. This is an entirely different proposition to the medieval system of common law, where the judge was akin to a conveyancer (i.e they were acting in an advisory capacity) - and the power of the jury was absolute.
As I have documented across numerous articles - the greater good is an esoteric principle that is used to justify evil.
The living natural law of inalienable rights is wholly different from codified statutes, legislation, and the laws of the dead corporate entity, the latter representing a barrier between the former. Our legal mechanisms speak in a forked tongue that relegates the individual to the status of a pauper. A hidden feudal control mechanism that on an ever-increasing myriad of issues, leaves the flock at the mercy of the wolves.
Perceptualflaws
Capital & Commerce
The veiled financial lubrication of the 4th industrial revolution is the intended commoditisation and capitalisation of every aspect of human thought, action, and interaction, all of which can be utilised as a means of monetary gain. See Microsoft patent WO2020060606. Make no mistake - you are considered to be human capital.
The appropriate definition of capital for Federal budgeting, including: use of capital for the Federal Government itself or the economy at large; owner-ship by the Federal Government or some other entity; defense and non-defense capital; physical capital and intangible or human capital; distinc-tions among investments in and for current, future, and retired workers; distinctions between capital to in-crease productivity and capital to en-hance the quality of life; and existing definitions of capital for budgeting. Mar. 4/ Administration of William J. Clinton, 1997 Source
All of man's interactions are considered to be commerce. The laws of commerce derive from Babylon. Aside from canon law; elements of English law and the refined uniform commercial code (UCC) (which controls bonds, security, transactions) are based upon the codified law of the Shetar, which in turn is derived from Talmudic law. Equally, the laws of commerce have further interconnections with Admiralty law. Indeed, maritime law is a commercial law that usurps several of the inalienable rights of common law - a process that equates the person with conveyance, liabilities, and commercial agreements.
The fundamental nature of the commercial maxims are the foundational axioms that inform the nature of man's law. Whilst commerce is often perceived as the governance of trade, in the light of the intended communitarian system and associated governance of speech and interaction, it is ever more pertinent to note that commerce encompasses human relationships.
The laws of commerce constitute the rules of a game that few are aware is being played. Keep an eye on the fine print and read until the end
Black’s law dictionary 5th edition page 244
Registration
The registration process carries the potential implication that you’re abandoning your title of ownership. At the cusp of the 4th industrial revolution, registration is also a backhanded way of (slowly but surely) transferring control ("you will own nothing and be happy") to our soulless slave masters. This aspect of the registration process is already evidenced within many modern engines and computer operating systems, that you buy but never wholly own, which (upon registration) are licensed back to you with terms and conditions.
The word bond is derived from the word bondage, and this is what is occurring, the world is being incrementally led into bondage.
To submit carries the legal connotations of submission and voluntary surrender. The word application can be translated to signify that you are a beggar. Thus within this context, we should also be aware that the word carries the presumption that you are aware of what you are relinquishing in order to obtain what you are begging for.
What we have is a ritualistic system of legal sorcery that’s based upon curses, sacrifices, and the voluntary surrender (submission) of your God-given rights. These are the legal ties that bind us and blind us.
Registering A Birth
There is a shadow system of control that operates behind the veil of perception. Either you see it, or you don't, and if you won't, you never will.
Through process and legislation we can observe the subversive infiltration of natural law. The usurpation of your God-given (inalienable) rights begins from the very moment your parents submit an application to register your birth. The birth registration gives the child their legal name, a process that turns the child into an entity (legal person/estate/trading name) on a registrar - see my previous statements on commerce.
Once registered, the legal entity enters the realm of lawful conveyance (both benefits and liabilities), statutes, and commercial agreements. A process that takes the child from that of a credit (with an inalienable right to worldly resources) to the world, to someone indebted to the system that controls it. The legal title also displays that the child is now the property of the state, hence why the birth certificate displays the Mother/Father not as a parent, but as an informant. Not only are you indebted - within communitarianism, if you operate outside of the common good (which again. is that which aligns with and supports the principles of the system) you are considered to be a liability.
Phonetics is a branch of linguistics that studies how humans produce and perceive sounds. Source
The twenty-two characters of the Phoenician script revolutionized the written language. Source
As per the occultic nature of the English language, are you parents or a pair that rent? If there is a veiled truth in that statement - who are you renting your children from? The state? Interestingly, the Phoenicians were known as masters of language and linguistic manipulation. Within the English language their influence is discernible to this very day - we speak on the telephone and when someone is deceptive they are commonly known as being phoney.
The Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 (lost at sea rules) equates to the fact that after seven years an unclaimed person would be considered as dead. To take advantage of the person being traded as a commodity, in the 1700s (as a means of being traded before the age of seven) all birth registrations carried the presumption that the individual was considered lost at sea. Thus, unless this assumption is refuted, it implies that the birth certificate is a certificate of death.
The corporate fiction of YOU is distinguished from the living you by the fact that all official governmental/legal letters are in upper case capitals. When ewe are “summoned to appear” in court, is the living you being resurrected? Certainly, an interesting choice of words
Whilst your birth certificate could be considered as an incorporated legal fiction, a traded legal fiction that is akin to a financial future for the state. Contrary to popularised misconception and calculated manipulation, you cannot claim against a fiction. There is no pot of gold waiting for you, and anyone who tells you different is either misled or attempting to mislead.
.
Although it is perceived as against the law not to register a birth (an obligation), by registering through consent (we will consent to every aspect of our enslavement) at a deeper level it displays that the child was given to the state of our freewill. Equally, under the guise of public health screening - over the last fifty years and throughout the Western world, every newborn child has had a sample of their blood taken. A grey area being, why is it stored indefinitely? Who has a right of