The Rockefellers & the Tavistock Institute
This is a heavily edited/expanded version of an article I wrote several years back.
As noted throughout their official history, alongside their into human sexuality (which I documented in this article) the Rockefeller Foundation connections to psychiatry cannot be overstated. Indeed, it is not an exaggeration to state that through the Rockefeller Foundation psychiatry project, the roots of the entire American psychiatric field were born of Rockefeller soil/funding. Further details relating to the formative founding and sponsorship of numerous psychiatric institutes and research projects can be found within their 1947 RF Annual Report. Herein we can also observe that it was a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation that facilitated the creation of the Tavistock Institute.
The Rockefeller Foundation is proud to be part of your history, beginning with a grant that was made on the cusp of the Second World War. The story of our partnership began in 1939 when the Foundation provided one of the founding grants to the Institute – a staggering $19,500! – to support the growth and advancement of the study of psychiatry. Source
The Tavistock Institute
"We are a not-for-profit organisation which applies social science to contemporary issues and problems" Source
From my research, the Tavistock Institute is focused upon social and informational control, behavioural modification/dynamics, group dynamics, social change, and indeed cultural transformation. In many ways, they could be considered as a glue that binds the various strands of seemingly unconnected global governance. Drawing upon a resource pool of psychology, social sciences, and sociology, and onward into the intersectional nature of psychiatry, they also have myriad connections to big pharma. Due to their intimate affiliations, they will also be utilising the resource pool of the Rockefeller Foundation.
The Tavistock Institute was the progeny of the Tavistock clinic whom were funded by both the Rothschilds and the British Royal family. The clinic played a key role in military psychology and worked within psychological warfare.
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations or TIHR is a British not-for-profit organisation that applies social science to contemporary issues and problems. It was initiated in 1946, when it developed from the Tavistock Clinic and was formally established as a separate entity in September 1947. Source
It is perhaps ironic that an organisation originally tasked with rehabilitating shell-shocked soldiers would latterly nudge Western society toward a psychotic break from reality. Such is the arrogance of the social architect - believing they not only have the innate right to deconstruct society (and the human psyche) but they also possess the ability to rebuild it in their delusionary image.
A Tangled Web
Shortly after the formation of the Institute, the Rockefellers began funding the Kinsey reports. Whilst you may recall that Kinsey's work was criticised for focusing on biology at the expense of psychology, we can also consider the nature of compartmentalisation, Certainly, on the macro scale the psychological analysis was already well covered.
In modernity, the Tavistock Institute operates within a sphere of influence and social change apparatus. A network that includes thousands of corporations, companies, institutes, foundations, NGOs, study groups, and think tanks. Through their multifarious connections into the heart of government and governmental institutions, you can further consider their influence within advertising campaigns and the manufacturing of social archetypes/principles and morally relativistic communitarian ideals.
Marc Tessier-Lavigne, a neuroscientist and president of Rockefeller University, has been named the 11th president of Stanford University. He will assume his new post on September 1. Source
Through their intimate connections with the Stanford research institute, Tavistock has become highly influential within the national education association. Their tentacles further entangled with military intelligence, mass media, religion, science, psychology, and psychiatry. Further Tavistock affiliations have included: the European Union, Shell, The Rockefeller Foundation, RAND, The Brookings Institute, Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission, MIT, Hudson Institute, Macy Foundation, Heritage Foundation, CFR, IMF, World Bank, NASA, CIA, MI6 and the Pilgrims Society. Equally, Tavistock, Rand, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, and the Aga Khan University - are further endorsed by the UK government.
Tavistock Safe Spaces?
We create safe spaces for difficult conversations Source
Through their educational affiliations, it's not too much of a stretch to consider whether institutions associated with the Tavistock Institute are the progenitors of weighted terminologies (externally crafted ideologies and self-identifications) that have spread through academia and on into the wider world of online and public discourse. The cultivation of political and indeed psychological landscapes from which to introduce loaded words, identities, and manufactured archetypes, ensures that their associated debate creates a broader social awareness. The thoughts, actions, and interactions, of the individual, primed by the environment (and the perceived moral virtue of the consensus reality) in which they live.
Whether you seek to create a safe space or whether you ridicule the incredulity of the suggestion, both the thesis and antithesis (the perceptual bookends) are utilised as a means of controlling the perceptions (and freedoms) of the middle man. A game of psychology ensuring that at the opposing end of the pc spectrum, the goaded reaction against a safe space or perceived woke ideology is for their language to become more inflammatory. This is a trap that enables further speech restrictions and hate redefinitions to be imposed upon the wider public.
Connecting Strands Of The Tavistock Order
Whilst the actions and articulations of some of the individuals I'm going to discuss speak for themselves, it is important to note that we're dealing with institutional compartmentalisation. An interlinking labyrinth of interconnected institutions, corporations, foundations, movements, individuals, funding mechanisms, and tenuous common ground, each seemingly decentralised component remaining loosely (ideologically) affiliated to a centralised whole. This is the essence of unstructured social governance.
In virtue of its occultic structure, the shadow system exists as a means of manufacturing consent, whilst collectivising and harnessing dissent. All discourse carried out within the false dichotomies and strategised social symmetries of the overarching narrative, ensure that whether you're fighting for aspects of it, fighting against it, or fighting with each other, you are still enabling its implementation.
As externally introduced dialectics evolve into socially engineered movements. The agenda progresses by placing the right mindsets in the right places, through cultivating the social conditions/perceptions that enable the seeds of change to flourish. Ideological, spiritual, intellectual, and philosophical alignments enabling the plan to proceed through our own volition and with scant awareness of the destination.
In consideration as to how a singular individual can connect multiple strands of social engineering apparatus. Here we can follow the career of the heralded father of social psychology - Kurt Lewin, from his connections to the Frankfurt School, and then on into his influence over Tavistock founding member, Eric Trist. Indeed, although he died in the same year as its formation, through their incorporation and use of his theories and practices, (which to this day are an integral component of the Tavistock methodology) Lewin is widely recognised as the shadow founder of the Tavistock Institute.
I was very much influenced by Kurt Lewin in those days. Eric Trist
Eric Trist was a founder member of the Tavistock Institute and chairman from 1956 - 1966. He spent his last years in the preparation of The Social Engagement of Social Science. Source
Furthermore, Kurt Lewin was also a visiting professor at Stanford University, and practiced at the IOWA child welfare research station, (which was funded by Lawrence K Frank of the Rockefeller Foundation.). He was also the chief organiser behind the Institute of Social Research at the University of Michigan, the Harvard Psychological Clinic, and the director of the MIT Research Center for Group Dynamics. The latter of which was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. Of note is the fact that the Tavistock journal titled ("human relations") was a joint publication between Lewin's MIT group dynamics research center and the Tavistock Institute.
Lewin’s contribution to the field of social psychology is clear. Schellenberg (1978) credits him with enormous influence and states that at least half of America’s most prominent social psychologists in the 1950’s and 1960’s were his students or close associates.
It was two of Lewin's papers titled Frontiers in group dynamics that gave birth to the Tavistock journal. Whilst the above National Training Laboratories Institute for Applied Behavioural Science was founded by Lewin, and is now part of the National Education Association. I also don't feel it is too much of a supposition to consider how Lewin's pioneering work on group dynamics has been incorporated into the (manufactured) global to local consensus-led control mechanisms of communitarianism - i.e global social/environmental governance.
Strategic Planning For The Social Breakdown
Of note is the fact that I wrote this article pre-covid
The below excerpt is taken from a paper titled "Strategic Planning for Mental Health" which can be found here. The paper was written in 1940 by Tavistock Institute founder member Dr John Rawling Rees.
Strategic Planning for Mental Health by Colonel John Rawling Rees
It was Reese that developed the Tavistock Method which was a behaviour modification programme (born of the Northfield experiments) that incites tension and then manipulates the associated stress (by harnessing the methodology of peer pressure) as a means of convincing people to relinquish firmly held beliefs. In the modern era, we can observe how similar methodologies have been drawn into the mainstream and are being utilised as a means of manufacturing a (implied or realised) consensus. A statement that is indicative in the formation of communitarianism.
Below we can observe the Tavistock influence in the transitory evolution of fascism to the unstructured global to local governance principles of communitarianism. Note the community control mechanisms and the community action projects that would evolve to become fake (corporate-funded) grassroots movements such as Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter, and a myriad of others whose financial and ideological interconnections I have documented across numerous articles.
Again, what they're alluding to below is the psychological formation of what would latterly become known as the "Global Citizen" - or "Communitarian". Individualised components of the collectives that perceive themselves to be fighting against the system - whilst remaining oblivious to the fact that they are the neo-system!
Continuing, alongside his work for the Tavistock Institute, Reese was the co-founder and first president of the World Federation for Mental Health. The WFMH has since become an NGO with formal consultative status within the United Nations. Formatively it was a (Macy Foundation affiliated) cybernetics group project, and its board contained 1/2 dozen cybernetic conference attendees. The WFMH founding statement was written by cybernetic group members Margaret Mead and the aforementioned Lawrence K Frank (who was the vice president of the Macy Foundation & head of child development at the Rockefeller Foundation), and can be found in a paper titled "mental health and world citizenship" which was handed out at the 1948 International Congress on Mental