So what I see happening in part in reaction to Charlie's death is the media sees we've gone too far. Now, they may not, may not have the best intentions, still, and they may reverse course after the initial flood. And God knows when that ends. I hope it never does.
But the flood of reactions, emotional reactions, support for Christian values, for Charlie. And the other thing that is done here is really, really hurt the left, and we should not take our boots off their neck to the extent that we have them now, when you see people, particularly teachers and those who hold public trust, politicians. Spewing out this hate when everyone on both sides thumbs her line out of the sides of their mouth.
https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2023/10/21/22/00/chain-8332727_640.jpgSource
Say we want calm, we want peace. But Jimmy Kimmel goes out there, and some autistic kid in the middle of Ohio is going to go grab a gun and and and so look I I I want to talk about this just to end with this. It turns my comments on Bondi and Trump. Yes, Bondi and Trump are trying to tie speech to violence and there. It was a chain that you can follow that allows the criminalization of that conduct or speech.
But it is the Supreme Court case on it is Brandenburg versus the state of Ohio, and it's held that where there was a likelihood. Of those two elements, a likelihood of imminent harm or violence to a person or persons because of that fear, then that is criminal speech, but hate speech is not defined, and I don't want Trump.
I don't want this administration's I don't want the deep state that he's. And defending with this lack of the Epstein prosecutions, I don't want the CIA, the Nor A, or anyone to have any more power than they do right now. And thanks for the rant.