Absolute proof that Satan worshippers are involved in the Nexium Mind Control experiments. They literally devised a method of determining if someone was a Luciferian, by subjecting them to stimulus and then measuring the results. Who wants to test if someone is a Luciferian? A Luciferian cult, of course. One financed by billionaires, that just got criminally charged with child sex trafficking, whose doctor just lost their medical license for conducting traumatic human experiments.
The Luciferian mental system that NXIVM founder Keith Raniere came up with was such important technology to the cult, that they patented it. This is not some joke patent, it is quite detailed - and horrific in its implications. The human experiments they were doing involved making people watch gang rape and dismemberment; where did they get this content from? Their own rituals?
The tech described by this patent could be used to program Luciferians, and to measure the effectiveness of the programming, in just the same way it apparently suggests its could be used for de-programming. As above, so below; turn the cross upside down. The Satanists love inversion. The way to rehabilitate a Luciferian is with Jesus Christ and the Bible, renouncing Wickedness. They don't need to watch snuff movies, anyone who thinks that is the path to salvation is obviously already under mind control.
They were subjecting cult members to Luciferian images and shocking brutality, and measuring their brainwaves to see who was a remorseless psychopath without empathy and who was easily susceptible to hypnosis. These were not just experiments, this was MKULTRA programming and deep state operative recruiting.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130281879
I will post the patent at the end.
At my blog Burners.Me I covered the CIA-connected Templeton Foundation and Oxford University's bizarre in-depth dexual profiling Questionnaire as part of the Burning Man Black Rock City Census: Making Sense of the Non-Census
I've also shared video of one of the Burning Man founders saying "we've created a machine to transform personalities". This is the Algorithm-Computer part of the diagram. I'm not saying there is a link between Burning Man and Nexium, I have no evidence of that...yet. Let's just say it "rhymes with Burning Man".
https://vimeo.com/164357369
Hat tip to @TheOuterLight who covered this in his show after finding it on Reddit.
Please peruse my other Nexium coverage: https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@steveouttrim/is-nexium-a-mkultra-brownstone-operation https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@steveouttrim/is-nexium-a-mkultra-brownstone-operation-part-2 https://steemit.com/politics/@steveouttrim/ny-attorney-general-steps-down-beat-4-women-links-to-nexium-weinstein-clinton https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@steveouttrim/are-stormy-daniels-and-dr-jennifer-pena-branded-nxivm-slaves (https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130281879).
Determination of whether a luciferian can be rehabilitated Abstract An aspect of the present invention is a method for determining whether a Luciferian can be rehabilitated. The method includes stimulating the Luciferian with a first stimulus and recording a first physiological response by the Luciferian to said first stimulus. The method includes determining, from the first physiological response, a first polarity of the Luciferian's response to the first stimulus. The method includes stimulating the Luciferian with a second stimulus and recording a second physiological response by the Luciferian to said second stimulus. Further, the method includes determining, from the second physiological response, a second polarity of the Luciferian's response to the second stimulus. The method includes comparing the first polarity to the second polarity to determine whether the second polarity has a greater value than the first polarity; and determining, from said comparing of first polarity and second polarity, whether the Luciferian can be rehabilitated.
Claims (21)
What is claimed is: 1. A method for determining whether a Luciferian can be rehabilitated, said method comprising: stimulating said Luciferian with a first stimulus; recording a first physiological response by said Luciferian to said first stimulus; determining, from said first physiological response, a first polarity of said Luciferian's physiological response to said first stimulus; stimulating said Luciferian with a second stimulus; recording a second physiological response by said Luciferian to said second stimulus; determining, from said second physiological response, a second polarity of said Luciferian's physiological response to said second stimulus; comparing said first polarity to said second polarity to determine whether said second polarity has a greater value than said first polarity; and determining, from said comparing of said first polarity and said second polarity, whether said Luciferian can be rehabilitated. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus consists of one stimulus component, wherein the Luciferian's corresponding physiological response consists of one response component. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said at least one stimulus comprises an N-component stimulus vector {S1, S2, . . . , SN} such that N is at least 2, wherein the polarity of the Luciferian's corresponding physiological response to said at least one stimulus is an N-component polarity vector {P1, P2, . . . , PN} such that P1, P2, . . . , PN respectively corresponds to S1, S2, . . . , SN. 4. The method of claim 3, wherein P1, P2, . . . , PN are mutually independent. 5. The method of claim 3, wherein one of P1, P2, . . . , PN has a dependence on another of P1, P2, . . . , PN. 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: representing a space in a first electronic dataset format; 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: representing a subspace in a second electronic dataset format. 8. The method of claim 1 wherein said first stimulus is obvious or unobvious. 9. The method of claim 1 wherein said second stimulus is obvious or unobvious. 10. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one physiological response to takes place in a variably controllable environment. 11. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus comprises an event stream. 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the event stream is in a real-time mode. 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the event stream is in a playback mode. 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the event stream is selected from the group consisting of a movie, a play, a television performance, a sports event, a military event, and combinations thereof. 15. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus comprises a visual stimulus. 16. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus comprises an audio stimulus. 17. The process of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus comprises a tactile stimulus. 18. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus comprises a multimedia stimulus. 19. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus comprises a combination stimulus. 20. A method for determining a humanity of a Luciferian, comprising: stimulating said Luciferian with a plurality of constructive stimuli; recording a physiological response by said Luciferian corresponding to each constructive stimulus of said plurality of constructive stimuli; determining, from each constructive stimulus, a corresponding polarity of the Luciferian's response for each constructive stimulus to determine a greatest value; and determining, from said greatest value, a humanity of said Luciferian. 21. A method for determining a humanity of a Luciferian, comprising: stimulating said Luciferian with a plurality of destructive stimuli; recording a physiological response by said Luciferian corresponding to each destructive stimulus of said plurality of destructive stimuli; determining, from each destructive stimulus, a corresponding polarity of the Luciferian's response for each destructive stimulus to determine a least value; and determining, from said least value, a humanity of said Luciferian.
Description RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application is a continuation in part of Ser. No. 12/272,941, filed on Nov. 18, 2008, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 11/931,524, filed on Oct. 31, 2007. BACKGROUND [0002] 1. Technical Field [0003] The present invention relates to a method for determining whether a person, who has destructive tendencies, may be rehabilitated. [0004] 2. Related Art [0005] Organizations such as businesses, religions, governments, law enforcement agencies, schools, etc. have had difficulties when individuals disrupt the organization's well-being by committing destructive acts. If organizations can identify such individuals they may better interact with them. Since these destructive individuals do not overtly disclose their nature, it is not easy to detect their presence. Failure to discover these individuals could be costly due to their destructive inclinations. There is a need to determine whether a given person, who has destructive tendencies, may be rehabilitated. SUMMARY [0006] The present invention provides an objective and accurate capability for determining whether a Luciferian may be rehabilitated. A Luciferian is a person, who commits destructive acts. A Luciferian is a type of sociopath. He has severe behavioral problems that are masked by good psychological adjustment. He appears on the outside to be sane but he is not. A Luciferian is fundamentally unhappy and feels enmity toward others but has learned that, for him, pleasure can be had from achieving his selfish desires such as destroying material objects or relationships, and causing others pain, distress, or unhappiness. A Luciferian realizes his desires by any means—without consideration for others and without remorse. A Luciferian is a person lacking in conscience and loyalty to others. He commonly employs manipulation and deceit to achieve his desired end and is therefore capable of acts that could be highly destructive to those that interact with him. A Luciferian, therefore, typically experiences pleasure or gratification in situations where “normal” people would be repulsed or disturbed. [0007] A first general aspect of the present invention is a method for determining whether a Luciferian can be rehabilitated, comprising: stimulating said Luciferian with a first stimulus; recording a first physiological response by said Luciferian to said first stimulus; determining, from said first physiological response, a first polarity of said Luciferian's physiological response to said first stimulus; stimulating the Luciferian with a second stimulus; recording a second physiological response by the Luciferian to said second stimulus; determining, from said second physiological response, a second polarity of the Luciferian's physiological response to said second stimulus; comparing said first polarity to said second polarity to determine whether said second polarity has a greater value than said first polarity; and determining, from said comparing of said first polarity and said second polarity, whether said Luciferian can be rehabilitated. [0008] A second general aspect of the present invention is a method for determining a humanity of a Luciferian, comprising: stimulating said Luciferian with a plurality of constructive stimuli; recording a physiological response by said Luciferian corresponding to each constructive stimulus of said plurality of constructive stimuli; determining, for said each constructive stimulus, a corresponding polarity of said physiological response; comparing said corresponding polarity of said physiological response for said each constructive stimulus to determine a greatest value; and determining, from said greatest value, said humanity of said Luciferian. [0009] A third general aspect of the present invention is a method for determining a humanity of a Luciferian, comprising: stimulating said Luciferian with a plurality of destructive stimuli; recording a physiological response by said Luciferian corresponding to each destructive stimulus of said plurality of destructive stimuli; determining, for said each destructive stimulus, a corresponding polarity of said physiological response; comparing said corresponding polarity of said physiological response for each destructive stimulus to determine a least value; and determining, from said least value, said humanity of said Luciferian. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0010] FIG. 1 depicts a representation of a human brain identifying the locations of the ventral tegmental area, the nucleus accumbens, and the prefrontal cortex. [0011] FIG. 2 depicts a person's relative change in dopamine levels as represented by positron emission tomography (PET) scans. [0012] FIG. 3 depicts a person's physiological responses to a stimulus, said physiological responses being recorded by instrumentation, said physiological responses being processed according to an algorithm to determine whether the person is a Luciferian. [0013] FIG. 4 depicts a space of potential polarities in relation to the stimulus of FIG. 3 and a subspace of the space, wherein the subspace defines a Luciferian. [0014] FIG. 5 depicts an event stream comprised by the stimulus of FIG. 3. [0015] FIG. 6 represents the stimulus of FIG. 3 as having N stimulus components with an associated N polarity components, wherein N∃2. [0016] FIG. 7 represents the N stimulus components and N polarity components of FIG. 6 as an N-component stimulus vector S and an associated N-component polarity vector P. [0017] FIG. 8 depicts a flow chart for determining whether the person in FIG. 3 is a Luciferian. [0018] FIG. 9 depicts the flow chart of FIG. 8 with added steps relating to the space of FIG. 4. [0019] FIG. 10 depicts a person's response to items on a questionnaire, said responses being recorded by instrumentation, said responses being processed according to an algorithm to determine whether the person is a Luciferian. [0020] FIG. 11 depicts a flow chart for determining whether the person in FIG. 10 is a Luciferian. [0021] FIG. 12 depicts the flow chart of FIG. 11 with added steps relating to the space of FIG. 4. [0022] FIG. 13 depicts a flow chart for generating a polarity profile of a questionnaire. [0023] FIG. 14 depicts a flow chart for determining whether the Luciferian may be rehabilitated. [0024] FIG. 15 depicts a flow chart for determining a humanity of a Luciferian. [0025] FIG. 16 depicts a flow chart for an alternative method of determining a humanity of a Luciferian. [0026] FIG. 17 depicts the recording and processing a response to a stimulus. DETAILED DESCRIPTION [0027] Strong feelings of satisfaction are associated with behaviors that meet various human needs. For example, specific areas in the human brain provide pleasurable sensations as a “reward” for these behaviors. These areas are interconnected with one another to form what is known as the “reward circuit”. The reward circuit in the brain provides feelings of satisfaction to encourage us to repeat pleasurable experiences that we learn in the course of our lives. The reward circuit is at the heart of our mental activity and guides all our behaviors. This circuit is complex, but it contains a central link that plays a fundamental role. This link is comprised of the nerve connections between two particular small groups of neurons. FIG. 1 contains a depiction of the human brain and the location of these groups of neurons. One of these groups is located in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) 1, and the other in the nucleus accumbens 2. The chemical messenger that makes the connections between these two groups of neurons is dopamine. Dopamine is a chemical messenger (neurotransmitter) in the brain. Thus, there is an association between feelings of pleasure and dopamine. For example, when the cortex has received and processed a sensory stimulus indicating a reward, it sends a signal announcing this reward to the VTA 1 whose activity then increases. The VTA 1 then releases dopamine, not only into the nucleus accumbens 2 but also into the septum, the amygdala, and the prefrontal cortex 3. The nucleus accumbens 2 then activates the individual's motor functions, while the prefrontal cortex 3 focuses his or her attention. These regions are part of the reward circuit. The reward circuit is part of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB), whose activation leads to the repetition of the gratifying action to strengthen the associated pathways in the brain. [0028] The MFB is a bundle of axons that originates in the reticular formation, crosses the VTA, passes through the lateral hypothalamus, and continues into the nucleus accumbens as well as the amygdala, the septum, and the prefrontal cortex. The MFB is composed of ascending and descending pathways, including most of the pathways that use monoamines as a neurotransmitter. The mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic system is one of its main components. This system comes into play when a person experiences pleasure. [0029] Another distinct pleasure circuit, driven by opioids, overlaps considerably with the dopamine system, to the point where some cells take part in both circuits. A key part of this system is the ventral pallidum which takes in signals from the nucleus accumbens and passes them on to the cortex. Additionally, cells nearer the surface of the brain, in a region of the forebrain called the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), may have a vital role as well. [0030] Pleasure is a direct response to a sensory stimulus. One of the first brain regions to process sensory information is the OFC. Signals such as taste, touch, smells, and sounds travel first to the sensory cortex, and from there go straight to the OFC. Visual information enters by a slightly less direct route. From here the signal passes into the opioid and dopamine circuits. A pleasant or unpleasant smell, taste, or touch is represented in the sensory cortex simply as a magnitude—strong brain activity for a strong smell and weak brain activity for a faint one, for example. But by the time it has passed on to the OFC it now correlates with how pleasant or unpleasant the stimulus may be rated. As each sensory signal passes through the OFC, it may receive a level of liking or disliking Activity in the OFC may increase or decrease in line with the level of pleasure people may feel for a given stimulus. [0031] The ventral pallidum and OFC may be associated with pleasure, but other parts of the brain's cortex may also become especially active during pleasure such as the cingulate cortex and somatosensory cortex. The emotion of pleasure may include the dopamine and opiate circuits and OFC, but actually feeling pleasure may require a level of reflection that can only be provide